Comment on my scoring

[DrPepper]

I have set up the following scoring structure and would appreciate comments:

Table scoring:

• Plr/Flp % (30-35) + 10
• Plr/Flp % (35-100) +15
• # of fish (1-2) +5
• # of fish (3-10) +15
• # of losers (3-10) +2
• # of regulars (4-10) -2
• avg PFR (0-3) +5
• avg PFR (3-5) +2
• avg VPIP (20-25) +5
• avg VPIP (25-30) +10
• avg VPIP (30-100) +20

Player scoring

• VPIP (30-40) +5
• VPIP (40-50) +10
• VPIP (50-100) +15
• PFR (0-5) +5
• PFR (5-10) +2
• # of Big Blinds (0-30) -5
• AF (0-2) +2
• WTSD (50-100) +5
• # of Tables (1-2) +5
• PFR/VPIP % (0-50) +10

[Zandry]

Looks great to me
One thing to consider if you haven't already, is that all the player scores get added up in the table's score. So the Avg VPIP and Avg PFR might be redundant. Also scoring by # of tables you should know it will not adjust the score until the end of a scan, unless you use permascan then it will correctly calculate the score during the scan

[DECISION]

i agree!
its a really nice idea
my setting are only:
table scoring :
0-10 vpip = 0
10-16=1
16-22=2
22-26=3
26-30=4
30-35=5
35-45=6

player scoring
0-10 vpip =1
10-16=5
16-20=10
20-25=15
25-35=25
35-45=35
45-50=50
50-100=100

[Zandry]

I thought of another good tip for you guys that isn't obvious:

If you have 2 rules, for example:

VPIP 20-40 = +5
VPIP 40-60 = +10

There is actually a small problem with these rules. If a player is exactly 40.00 VPIP, then he will meet both the rules and be given a score of +15. So the best way to do it is this:

VPIP 20-39.99 = +5
VPIP 40-59.99 = +10

And so on

[DECISION]

ok its a nice detail , thanks you.

[DrPepper]

Originally Posted by Zandry

I thought of another good tip for you guys that isn't obvious:

If you have 2 rules, for example:

VPIP 20-40 = +5
VPIP 40-60 = +10

There is actually a small problem with these rules. If a player is exactly 40.00 VPIP, then he will meet both the rules and be given a score of +15.

So the proper way to do it is this:

VPIP 20-39.99 = +5
VPIP 40-59.99 = +10

And so on

I did think about this but I figured that the probability that somebody has exactly a 40% VPIP is so small that it wouldn't really matter. But thanks for letting me know.

[grittner]

Originally Posted by DrPepper

I have set up the following scoring structure and would appreciate comments:

Table scoring:

• Plr/Flp % (30-35) + 10
• Plr/Flp % (35-100) +15
• # of fish (1-2) +5
• # of fish (3-10) +15
• # of losers (3-10) +2
• # of regulars (4-10) -2
• avg PFR (0-3) +5
• avg PFR (3-5) +2
• avg VPIP (20-25) +5
• avg VPIP (25-30) +10
• avg VPIP (30-100) +20

Player scoring

• VPIP (30-40) +5
• VPIP (40-50) +10
• VPIP (50-100) +15
• PFR (0-5) +5
• PFR (5-10) +2
• # of Big Blinds (0-30) -5
• AF (0-2) +2
• WTSD (50-100) +5
• # of Tables (1-2) +5
• PFR/VPIP % (0-50) +10

Hello im new, waht wlil a good score be >70, >80 etc, and for the autowaitlist waht filter do you recomend ...... tx.